What Can Brexit And Trump Teach Design?


Friday morning we all woke up to a world that had literally changed over night. Having arrived in Copenhagen from my home in Los Angeles the night before, and suffering from jet lag, I closely followed the election into the early morning. When I finally went to bed, all prognoses declared that the UK would remain in the European Union. When I woke up the next morning the reality was very different.

The British had decided to leave the European Union to unilaterally design their own future. No longer would they collaborate closely with the remaining twenty-seven European countries, taking other's concerns into consideration. This was a decision, which to a large extent was guided by emotions rather than reason. What can politicians, business people and problem solvers alike learn from this earth-shattering event?

The Brexit election exposed, without a doubt, a chasm between the European intellectual elite and the common man. In a dictatorship, these groups' misperceived differences in interests are suppressed; however in a democracy the consequences eventually bite everybody in the butt during elections. The Brexit and Trump phenomenon provide vivid current examples of this. As Shakespeare said: "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark."

As in all types of businesses, whether it is a company, government or any other form of organization that provides solutions, losing touch with one's users, quickly result in a dramatic decline in market shares. Recent examples of this are Nokia, East German Communist party and the Catholic Church. What these institutions failed to consider was not just physical needs, but maybe even more importantly, they failed to address emotional needs.

In the case of Brittan, the politicians failed to address half of the population's need for feeling included, having pride and trusting that their world was going in the right direction. Similarly, for American politicians, especially the Republican Party, they are failing to address very same fundamental human needs.

The most frustrating thing is that these catastrophic events are not Acts of God; they are man made and therefore preventable. The first step of basic Design Thinking is to understand one's users in the field, not sitting in one's ivory tower or 'think tank' and making things up.

Intellectually, the British and American elite know that over the past decades the gap in wealth between the top one percentile and everyone else has increased. They may also see that technological development has divided people into those with and those without a future. However, there is a huge difference between knowing and understanding.

Innovation providers, such as designers and engineers have, in past decades, invested heavily in "walking a mile" in their user's shoes and not just read technical specifications from marketing. This has provided us all with a wide range of amazing opportunities, - think Ebay, Facebook, Uber and Airbnb. In contrast to our politicians, their leaders, managers and development teams are directly, immediately and personally responsible and accountable for the outcome.

When did you last see user-centered, innovative and truly well designed solutions from politicians? As my century old Viking family saying goes: "If you cannot hear you will have to feel!" Friday the European elite and its politicians felt, when will the American politicians feel?

Download Now

Lihat Sumbernya → What Can Brexit And Trump Teach Design?
Download MP3 Terbaru → Babymetal Mp3 Download

Related Posts To What Can Brexit And Trump Teach Design?

What Can Brexit And Trump Teach Design? Rating: 4.5 Posted by: kian ws

Search Here

Popular Posts

Total Pageviews

Recent Posts